Welcome to the Curriculum & Leadership Journal website.
To receive our fortnightly Email Alert,
please click on the blue menu item below.
Curriculum & Leadership Journal
An electronic journal for leaders in education
ISSN: 1448-0743
Follow us on twitter

Abstracts

Quest for continual growth takes root

Volume 27 Number 2, Autumn 2006; Pages 28–30, 35
Mary Surdey, Jane M. Hashey

Kaizen is a Japanese word for continual improvement and higher quality performance. In an educational setting, kaizen can be implemented by identifying student needs, creating avenues to address them and developing teacher leadership. This has been done in the Vestal Central School district of New York state. Continuous growth in student achievement is seen in part to be due to a well-defined professional development program for all school staff in the district. This, in turn, relies on funding set aside for the purpose by the board of education, such that on any given day, 20 substitute teachers are available to allow teacher release across the district. The process begins with the recruitment process, where prospective teachers are exposed to the kaizen vision. Newly appointed teachers undergo initial orientation and then a three-year mentoring and induction program. Teachers meet in various combinations such as departments, teams or year levels. Student needs are determined by analysis of data collected by teachers that identifies successes and areas in need of improvement. These meetings continue throughout the school year. There is a coordinating district-wide professional development committee that receives feedback from a number of specific teams and subcommittees and that will recommend and prioritise programs and initiatives across the district. Giving teachers properly managed time, resources and opportunities to extend their own learning will result in schools that perform at ever-higher levels.

 

KLA

Subject Headings

Teaching profession
School leadership
School culture
Educational planning
Professional development

Six challenges are key for high-performing schools that aim to achieve more

Volume 27 Number 2, Spring 2006; Pages 22–27
Rossi Ray-Taylor, Sharon Baskerville, Shelley Bruder, Elaine Bennett, Karen Schulte

For meaningful change to occur there needs to be displeasure with the status quo and a perceived urgency for change. Such conditions are present every day in many schools. Some schools, however, are hallmarks of academic performance, their students sought by colleges and universities. These high-performing schools face unique challenges for continuous improvement, as there may be reluctance to seek even higher levels of achievement. The Minority Student Achievement Network (MSAN) has proposed several challenging suggestions for such schools. Teachers should be clear about what is meant by success and access to success. Intended or not, actions can send strong messages about school beliefs. The school culture should be such that a teacher feels it is safe to take risks, rather than just support the status quo. Scripted protocols set around improving staff–student relationships may be followed during staff meetings, which then become professional conversations and discourses. As staff explore issues, they feel safer in trying new practices and sharing results. The evolving teacher evaluation process also offers opportunities for teachers to identify goals for improvement. Teachers should be encouraged to collect their own achievement data and determine their own professional development. Improvement goals must be few, focused on class work, specific and measurable, observable and developed by the staff involved. Commitment to a long-term strategy will avoid short-lived and short-sighted initiatives. Staff should come, work and stay together, and stay focused for long enough to assess progress. Staff should ‘connect the dots’ between tradition and change by making clear how each change fits into a process of continuous improvement. Teachers should commit to high levels of achievement for all. Professional development should focus on appropriate strategies for those students found to be ‘at risk’ for reasons that may relate to race, class or gender. A school is no more successful than its least successful students, so there is always room to improve, even for highly performing schools.

KLA

Subject Headings

School leadership
School culture
Leadership
Educational planning
Educational innovations

Design do's and don'ts

November 2006; Pages 12–14
Franklin Brown, Gary Slutzky, et al.

School buildings represent a serious commitment of community resources, and should be planned to last for up to five generations. To respond to community needs, their design requires community input, and the building will in turn affect the community. The trend in design is towards deeply collaborative multidisciplinary teams working together from the beginning. Along with architects, engineers and educational planners, teams now include technology designers, green building consultants and maintenance planning advisors. Making best use of daylight might involve the architect, site designer, technology designer and mechanical and electrical engineers. The different participants should be required to collaborate – forcing the development of a group consciousness based on mutually determined goals. The author proposes a list of 'do's' for school leaders. Create a written consensus statement of values, goals and objectives. Insist on a schedule, budget, quality and safety, and be prepared to enforce the schedule. Reflect on long-term energy consumption. Evaluate design principles based on long-term costs. Consider ease of maintenance and operation. Start the design process by considering different learning modalities, and how these might require different learning spaces, and why, and how indoor and outdoor spaces should be related. Do not begin with a discussion of traditional building-centred approaches such as how many classrooms might be needed, and their proposed size. Include a comprehensive asset-based maintenance plan and business plan showing revenue and expenditure over the building’s life. Provide flexibility to accommodate future changes. Include appropriate current educational literature. Focus on wired and wireless pathways that will serve devices available in the near future. Accept that the distant future is unknowable. Don't use carpet in classrooms or low ceilings, and 'don’t forget the kids'.

KLA

Subject Headings

School buildings
Design

Linking literacy teaching with assessment: a continuing professional development initiative for secondary schools

Volume 40 Number 2, 5 July 2006; Pages 115–122
Douglas Fisher, Diane Lapp, James Flood, Kelly Moore

US researchers have investigated the effect of a graduate course in assessment on the skills, knowledge and attitudes of 25 teachers in formative literacy assessment. The course comprised three parts: a reintroduction to theoretical aspects of language development; an exploration of formal and informal literacy assessments; and clinical field experience, where each teacher was assigned ten struggling readers from two local schools to work with on a supervised one-to-one basis. Course participants created assessment profiles for each of their ten students, and shared updates on their progress in weekly seminars to the class. Four key themes emerged in analysis of the 25 teachers’ responses to the course. The first was ‘This is complex’. Most participants did not appreciate the complexity of literacy, or of assessment for learning, until they began using it with their individual students. The second common response was ‘I have to differentiate’. Participants came to realise the value of shaping their teaching around the needs and abilities of each individual child, rather than aiming at ‘the kid in the middle’. The third theme was ‘The texts I choose matter’. The teachers recognised a need to expand the range of books they offered their students to ensure that every student was reading at their optimal level. ‘I’m an assessment junkie’ was the last theme to emerge, as a number of course participants moved from simply giving their classes quizzes and formal examinations, to embracing a wide variety of informal assessments that could better inform their teaching. In general, the reading level of the students tutored by the course participants improved by an extra half-year level compared to their peers. Given that students in socially disadvantaged schools typically improve their reading at a rate of half a year level per school year, this represents a significant gain. Importantly, the course enabled teachers to view struggling students in terms of their abilities, and to reconceptualise ‘struggling readers’ as individuals following different paths to literacy acquisition.

Key Learning Areas

English

Subject Headings

Professional development
Assessment
Reading
Literacy

Students and buildings: the vital link

November 2006; Pages 6–8
Thomas Kube

The Australian chapter of the Council of Educational Facility Planners International (CEFPI) opened in 2000. This year a member of the Australian chapter won the CEFPI President’s Award for their work with Western Australia's Department of Education and Training. The award recognised the fact that the project concerned had moved away from the 'one-size-fits-all' approach to facility planning, based on the recognition that where children learn matters as much as what they learn. The CEFPI has commissioned two recent studies. The Milwaukee study compared student scores from facilities in varying condition and identified a direct relationship between the school environment and student achievement. The Maxwell study analysed student performance data from before, during and after the renovation of school buildings. There was an observed correlation between improved academic performance and newer facilities. Schools are becoming community centres, where learning and other activities take place beyond the eight-hour school day. They are also becoming smaller and more diverse environments, closely linked to the community within which they operate. The move away from traditional school facilities is seen as a response to limited funding, which has prompted the joint-use community centre concept, and also to high-performance schooling, where more environmentally sensitive communities are concerned about the links between sustainable architecture and student performance.

KLA

Subject Headings

School buildings

Literacy assessment, New Zealand style

Volume 64 Number 2, October 2006; Pages 74–79
Thomas R. Guskey, Jeffrey K Smith, Lisa F Smith, Terry Crooks, Lester Flockton

Commenced in 1995, New Zealand’s National Educational Monitoring Project (NEMP) is a comprehensive testing program designed to improve teaching and learning through formative assessment. Each year, a random sample of 1,440 students in Year 4 and Year 8 is tested. The curriculum areas assessed are rotated on a four-year cycle, with around three subjects tested each year. Participating schools are selected through stratified random sampling, ensuring representation across regions, districts and school sizes. Twelve students at Year 4 and Year 8 are tested in each school. Participation in NEMP is voluntary, but consistently exceeds 95 per cent, as schools value the professional development opportunity presented by NEMP’s innovative assessment tasks. Each participating student is assigned to one of three groups, each completing a different set of tasks. This enables a broader range of tasks to be incorporated. Tasks include one-to-one student–teacher interviews; ‘stations’, where groups of students rotate between different activities; ‘teams’, with four students working collaboratively; or students working independently on individual paper-and-pencil, creative or physical assignments. NEMP literacy tasks have included pronouncing Maori words, editing text or drawing an imaginary creature from aural instructions. Each NEMP assessment includes supplementary questions about students’ out-of-school activities, and whether they enjoyed the assessment tasks. New Zealand educators are provided with results for each task scored separately, not overall scores for the curriculum area assessed. This encourages in-depth analysis of each type of task, rather than simplistic generalisations. Year 4 and Year 8 students complete the same tasks in order to demonstrate how skills may develop over time. Results are reported only at the national level, broken down by gender, ethnicity and socioeconomic status. New Zealand teachers use NEMP data to inform instruction, and the New Zealand Ministry of Education uses it to guide national curriculum reforms. Such an assessment program is ‘the stuff of education fantasies’ for US educators struggling with stringent assessment procedures focused on school accountability rather than improving student learning.

KLA

Subject Headings

Educational evaluation
Assessment
New Zealand
Standards

Coming to grips with assessment in TESOL: a personal perspective

Volume 16 Number 1, August 2006; Pages 3–9
Kieran O'Loughlin

The author, a former secondary English as a Second Language (ESL) teacher, found the assessment-driven secondary curriculum compromised his ability to meet the needs of low-proficiency English language learners. Throughout his subsequent career in various academic and government ESL positions, he came to understand the potential of assessment to support student learning. In his first job at a university English language centre, he observed testing being used to place students into ability-level classes. This made both teaching and learning easier than in classes grouped by year level in the school system. He also observed ‘oral interviews’ being used for assessment purposes, which contrasted with the emphasis on written language he had encountered in school assessments. Later, as part of his postgraduate research, the author evaluated the cloze assessment procedure, where students fill in every nth word deleted from a text. This type of assessment has little learning value if deletions are made randomly, but can guide learning if deletions are carefully selected. He also explored telephone-based language assessments, finding that, as with oral interviews, the nature of the assessor had a significant impact on the outcome of the test. The author’s next roles involved developing controversial English entry tests for a university, and for government immigration services. These positions exposed him to the ‘harsh political realities’ of English testing. Returning to work in an English for Academic Purposes (EAP) course again immersed him in exemplary assessment practice, including extensive discussion, feedback and authentic assessment tasks. Teachers in the course spent as much time developing and implementing assessment as they did on their teaching, underlining the synergy between teaching and quality assessment for learning. The author now works as an education lecturer in language assessment.

Key Learning Areas

English

Subject Headings

Secondary education
Educational evaluation
English as an additional language
Assessment

Building a sustainable future

November 2006; Pages 16–19
Marcia Behrenbruch, Kerry Bolger

The Cornish campus of St Leonard’s College in Victoria uses an inquiry-based K–10 curriculum. It applies principles associated with the Reggio Emilia approach to education across all of the compulsory years. This approach emphasises the need for teachers to understand individual students and to draw on students’ natural curiosity, building their educational program from students’ existing interests. The school buildings have been designed to match the curriculum. A large internal space provides an area where large-scale products of project work can be left undisturbed, avoiding the need to spend time packing and unpacking material. The large building allows space for the performing arts and displays of visual art. Flexible seating arrangements also make it suitable for community activities. The space also permits many different and frequently changing groupings of students. The building embodies the schools’ commitment to environmental sustainability, using solar cells and water catchment facilities for power and temperature control. These facilities allow the tracking of wind speed, rainfall and humidity, used in maths and science activities. The concept of sustainability is also applied more generally in the curriculum. The concept of personal sustainability is used to cover students’ learning about their bodies and how to care for them. Personal sustainability serves as a starting point in learning how to be self-directed, also how to understand and communicate with other types of people, and how to understand the world more widely. This understanding is expressed more fully in the concepts of environmental, urban and socio-cultural sustainability.

KLA

Subject Headings

Curriculum planning
Compulsory education
Project based learning
School buildings
Classroom activities

Critical literacy, or just clear thinking

November 2006
Kevin Donnelly

Recent defences of critical literacy claim that its opponents do not fully understand the concept. With extensive experience and qualifications in English education, the author seeks to put forward an informed opposing view. The author and like-minded commentators, 'contrary to what advocates of critical literacy suggest', are in favour of teaching students to think critically and independently. Evaluating arguments, recognising techniques and understanding the manipulative power of texts have long been elements of the English curriculum, formerly termed ‘clear thinking’. The current view of critical literacy re-badges clear thinking under a left-wing political banner. Instead of being valued for their aesthetic and moral qualities, traditional texts are being reduced to cultural artefacts and deconstructed in terms of power relationships. For critical literacy advocates such as the Australian Association of English Teachers, the definition of literacy has moved far beyond just learning to read and write. Students are now being educated to become activists towards a ‘better world’, loosely defined as embodying the beliefs and values of the ‘cultural left’. Education should not be confused with indoctrination, but should value both change and continuity. As well as questioning and critiquing society, there is also a need to accentuate the universal and unchanging aspects of English literacy. Rather than regarding texts primarily as cultural weapons in a struggle for power, literacy education should embrace the ‘enduring truths about human nature that cross time and culture’ that can be found in all great writing.

Key Learning Areas

English

Subject Headings

Literacy
Thought and thinking
Education philosophy

MULTILIT book levels: towards a new system for levelling texts

December 2005
Sally Pearce, Kevin Wheldall, Alison Madelaine

The most appropriate reading texts for children are neither too easy nor too hard. Guiding children’s reading choices is therefore important, especially for struggling readers who often choose books at inappropriately high levels. Historically, a variety of approaches have been used to make it easier for teachers to match their students with texts at the right level. Prior to the 1980s, the staple reading diet of most school children were vocabulary-controlled readers, deliberately written according to formulaic readability standards. The repetitious and often contrived nature of these stories motivated educators to use ‘real’ texts. While thought to be more interesting to students, these texts were not graded, so standards for levelling them had to be developed. Both qualitative and quantitative measures have been developed for these standards. Quantitative measures include counting sentence length, syllables, word frequency or syntactic complexity. Cloze procedures have also been used to determine text level according to how well a test group of students can fill in every nth word in a modified text. Qualitative book levelling procedures expand on formulaic approaches by taking into account additional factors such as content, page format and use of illustrations. These approaches tend to be time-consuming and require extensive training. There is no empirical evidence to suggest that increasing the number of features that are assessed results in more accurate levelling. Macquarie University has developed the MULTILIT (Making Up Lost Time in Literacy) book levelling system as part of an intensive literacy program. In MULTILIT, each book to be levelled is first compared informally with readers from earlier Australian controlled vocabulary series, such as Rigby. Next, the book is tested on a sample of at least three children with a reading age close to the book’s estimated level to either confirm the estimate or suggest retesting. In schools, students may be matched with their MULTILIT reading level through either standardised or informal diagnostic reading tests, including the Wheldall Assessment of Reading Passages (WARP) test. Teachers should always consider students’ backgrounds and interests when directing their reading. This article has also appeared in Special Education Perspectives, vol 15, no 1, 2006.

Key Learning Areas

English

Subject Headings

Literacy
Reading
English language teaching

Tracking and the effects of school-related attitudes on the language achievement of boys and girls

Volume 27 Number 3, July 2006; Pages 293–309
Eva Van de gaer, Heidi Pustjens, Jan Van Damme, Agnes De Munter

Although gender gaps in some school subjects are closing, boys still tend to achieve lower results than girls in language education. It is well documented that more boys than girls have negative attitudes to school, perhaps resulting from sociocultural norms that associate school diligence with feminine, not masculine, identities. Belgian researchers investigated whether boys’ negative attitudes to schooling and lower achievement in language may be related. During their last four years of secondary schooling, 2,342 students participated in tests of their language ability, general cognitive ability and attitude to school. Background variables, including socioeconomic status and language spoken at home, were also tested, to eliminate the possibility of differences in achievement being attributable to external factors. In Belgium, students can opt for different levels of difficulty ('tracks') in their senior secondary courses, and the students were grouped according to the language track they had chosen. Consistent with expectations, students in the higher tracks had better relationships with their teachers, a greater sense of wellbeing at school, and more positive attitudes to homework than students in lower tracks. It was not clear whether their more negative attitudes were responsible for their lower achievement, or whether students had adopted negative attitudes as the result of immersion in lower level classes. Contrary to expectations, the higher achieving boys in the lower tracks showed the lowest levels of interest in learning tasks and highest tendency towards inattention in the classroom. It may be that these boys demonstrated inattention to offset the social stigma associated with being a higher-achieving boy. It may also be that the widespread practice of offering more typically 'male' subjects in less demanding tracks had attracted some intelligent boys to select classes below their ability level.

KLA

Subject Headings

Language and languages
Boys' education
Girls' education
Belgium

The impact of screening and advice on inattentive, hyperactive and impulsive children

Volume 21 Number 3, August 2006; Pages 321–337
Peter Tymms, Christine Merrell

Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) are more likely to experience behavioural, attitudinal and achievement difficulties in education than their peers. Although medication has produced the most significant results in helping students with ADHD, certain school-based interventions have also proved effective. Research was undertaken into the impact of two types of ADHD interventions for children in their first year of schooling in 2,040 English primary schools. In the first type of intervention, carried out in around 500 schools, children entering school were screened for ADHD symptoms, including inattentiveness, hyperactivity and impulsive behaviour. Screening results were provided to the schools. Another 500 schools were given an information booklet written especially for the project, providing advice about teaching students with ADHD. The remaining schools received either both interventions, or no interventions at all. Various interventions were also provided at the level of Local Education Area (LEA) administration, but no significant differences emerged. At the school level, simply identifying children with ADHD-like symptoms had no impact on teacher or student behaviour, attitudes and performance. Over two years, the advice booklets had a small positive impact on children with ADHD-like symptoms, and on the quality of life of their teachers. Only 12.2 per cent of the schools who received the booklet reported having used it, suggesting that further research is necessary on persuading teachers to access research advice. A surprising result was that schools receiving both interventions demonstrated lower reading and mathematics attainment for children with ADHD-like symptoms. The research supported two clear conclusions: that screening children with ADHD is unlikely to improve their educational outcomes, and that providing schools with research-based advice may be a cost-effective way of achieving some positive impact if teachers can be encouraged to access it.

KLA

Subject Headings

Special education
Behavioural problems
Attention
Great Britain

Using a learning journal to improve professional practice: a journey of personal and professional self-discovery

Volume 7 Number 3, August 2006; Pages 333–348
Mark Shepherd

The author, a managerial consultant, describes how he improved his professional practice using a reflective journal. As an ‘expert’ teaching others, he also felt a special responsibility to attend to his own learning and development. His instructional role provided few opportunities to receive collegial feedback, so he had to rely on the honesty of his own reflections to assess his performance. His journal entries began as ‘streams of consciousness’, simply recording thoughts as they arose. Over time, he started structuring each entry to describe what had happened, how he felt about it, what he thought about it, what he had learnt from it and the action he would take as a result of this learning. This format greatly assisted him in making sense of the complexity of his professional experiences. He often supplemented text entries with mind maps, photographs and drawings to help him reconnect to experiences in later reflection. Initial reflections often led to further reflection on the resultant changes to practice, creating a continuous spiral of improvement. By recording and analysing specific interactions, the author learned how best to reach the people he was teaching. As well as improving his practice, the journal enabled him to better understand the nature of his work. Common themes emerging in the journal led him to research and situate his practice in related theoretical literature. He also came to critically examine his values and beliefs, and how these were sometimes inconsistent with his practices. After a while, concerns that the journal focused too much on the negative led the author to experiment with a more affirmative stance, where he recorded what he felt was ‘right’ about his practice. This approach produced some increases in his own and his clients’ enthusiasm, but ran the risk of reducing the journal to a ‘self-fulfilling prophecy’. The author concluded that problematising his work, without being negative, was the most effective means of achieving sustained interrogation and continual improvement. 

KLA

Subject Headings

Professional development

To adopt, adapt or ignore? Challenging corporate type performance measures in State schools

Volume 12 Number 1, Winter 2006; Pages 76–90
Kay Bishop, Brigid Limerick

Education Queensland’s plans to improve public schools in the State are outlined in its key strategy statement, QSE – 2010: A Future Perspective. The strategy draws on two models of accountability widely used in the corporate world. The ‘triple bottom line’ is designed to measure environmental and societal as well as financial performance. The ‘balanced score card’ (BSC) similarly aims to move beyond basic economic priorities by measuring an organisation's internal learning, the success of its communication strategies and the effectiveness of its planning and feedback processes. The Education Queensland strategy puts forward a ‘balanced report card’ (BRC) based on the BSC model, consisting of 12 financial and non-financial performance measures. While the BRC identifies major areas of school responsibility, there are a number of significant problems in this form of evaluation. Some forms of performance, such as student–teacher relationships or school decision-making processes, cannot be quantified. They cannot be compared accurately between schools or over time. Terms such as ‘social capital’ are too vague to be used for the purposes of comparison. The BRC does not offer a guide to dealing with the complex issues associated with diverse communities and social disadvantage. Schools in such settings face more difficulties than elite schools in delivering the curriculum to their students. Many of these schools are making progress through attention to data analysis, teaching methods and PD, and by the alignment of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment that is articulated in the New Basics Research Report of 2004 and supported by findings of international research. However, the complex issues surrounding social disadvantage cannot be resolved simply by the application of a particular teaching strategy, syllabus or testing regime. In general, schools require ‘nuanced, local and differentiated analytical responses’ by educators to the particular conditions they face. However to perform this local evaluation well school staff require higher levels of understanding of how to analyse their school data, and how to monitor teaching and student learning effectively.

KLA

Subject Headings

Socially disadvantaged
State schools
Queensland
Educational evaluation
Educational accountability
Education and state

What (so-called) low-performing schools can teach (so-called) high-performing schools

Volume 27 Number 2, Spring 2006; Pages 43–45
Richard F. Elmore

A comparison of schools in affluent and low socioeconomic areas in the USA yielded some unexpected results. In low socioeconomic areas, higher-performing schools had typically attained their results through a deliberate process of school improvement. School leaders had clearly articulated expectations for student learning, adopted challenging curriculums and invested heavily in professional development. Teachers had internalised responsibility for student learning and engaged in ongoing critical examination of their practice, making adjustments wherever necessary. In wealthier schools, learning difficulties were largely seen as the responsibility of students and their families to resolve, with schools often recommending private tutoring as a solution for struggling students. Outsourcing teaching to private tutors meant teachers were not motivated to look for shortcomings in their own practice that might inhibit student learning. Affluent schools tended to regard variance in student achievement as a demonstration of differences in natural ability, rather than as a challenge to teachers’ practices. Limiting access to higher-level classes further reinforced the perception that achievement is determined by talent, not instruction. Although there are exceptions to this pattern, the position of a school in an affluent community may discourage many school leaders from taking the risks involved in school improvement. Wealthy parents may be uncomfortable with the suggestion that the teaching in their children’s schools needs improvement, trapping principals into defence of the status quo. The accountability measures currently used in US education are significant contributors to this paradox. Assessment instruments ignore the correlation between student achievement and socioeconomic status. Instead, they simply class all schools with similar academic results into one category, regardless of whether the results were achieved through the quality of the school or the socioeconomic background of its students.

KLA

Subject Headings

Socially disadvantaged
Social classes
United States of America (USA)
Standards
Education policy

There are no Conferences available in this issue.