Welcome to the Curriculum & Leadership Journal website.
To receive our fortnightly Email Alert,
please click on the blue menu item below.
Curriculum & Leadership Journal
An electronic journal for leaders in education
ISSN: 1448-0743
Follow us on twitter

Abstracts

What happens when salt dissolves in water? An introduction to scientific argument and counter argument drawn from the history of science

Volume 52 Number 1, Autumn 2006; Pages 24–27
Kevin de Berg

‘Putting the people back into chemistry’ can demonstrate to students that chemistry is not just exposition and explanation, but also a dynamic and sometimes controversial process. Modern textbooks have marginalised or completely removed references to the chemists and the arguments that once raged between them. Seemingly simple concepts such as the dissolution of salt in water can be used to deepen student understanding of the processes of science and demonstrate that the facts that now fill textbooks have had a disputed history. The controversy over the dissociation and association models for salts in water in the late 1800s and early 1900s provides a useful case study. Using historical data about the arguments and their proponents, students could be asked to produce a short vignette that summarised the major arguments for and against the two models. This approach could include associated, cross-curricular topics, for example deepening students’ knowledge of appropriate dress and language used in a given historical period.

Key Learning Areas

Science

Subject Headings

Chemistry
Science teaching
History
Curriculum planning

School choice and competition: a public market in education revisited

Volume 32 Number 3, July 2006; Pages 347–362
Carl Bagley

In 1993, the Parental and School Choice Interaction Study in England examined the marketisation of education. A recent case study of three secondary schools in England furthered this research by investigating the impact of the policy shift from school competition to cooperation between 1994 and 2004. In 1994, the three schools represented high, medium and low levels of achievement. The middle-level school responded to the pressures of competition by re-branding itself as a specialist technology school. It attracted more academically able students and boosted its results. The lowest-achieving school, attended mainly by children from the housing estate on which it was situated, faced a battle for survival, and was closed in 1999. A new school was built to replace it in a more middle-class area nearby, aimed at attracting students from a wider socioeconomic range. The school’s new principal undertook vigorous ‘environmental scanning’, engaging with prospective parents and acting on their wishes and concerns. Various innovations, such as student performance incentives, saw student achievement increase dramatically. The previously dominant school began losing enrolments to its two competitors, and responded by obtaining specialist status in languages. The current British Government has introduced a number of initiatives aimed at fostering school cooperation, such as the requirement that specialist schools enter partnerships with other schools to disseminate expertise. However, little inter-school collaboration was evident in this study. The two initially successful schools had provided support to the other when it was struggling, but this was motivated mainly by concern that socially disadvantaged children from the housing estate would appear in their classrooms if the school was closed. After the school was moved, the changed local dynamics meant specialisation policies aimed at fostering collaboration were in fact employed to gain competitive advantage. The two schools’ decisions to specialise, and the new school’s environmental scanning, suggest that schools are becoming shrewd actors in the educational marketplace, aware of the importance of the parental (consumer) ‘voice’, and of focusing on traditional academic qualifications to gain ground in performance tables. At the same time, as successful schools are inundated with more enrolments than they can accept, it is often the schools rather than parents who are making the choices.

KLA

Subject Headings

Education policy
Great Britain
Competition
Marketing

A qualitative investigation of the factors influencing the implementation of reform efforts in science education

Volume 9 Number 1, March 2006; Pages 61–68
David Todd Campbell

The 1996 USA's National Science Education Standards (NSES) were introduced to reform traditional models of science teaching by emphasising inquiry-based, constructivist learning. However, these reforms have not been widely implemented in schools. Researchers used their involvement in a professional development course in inquiry-based learning as an opportunity to investigate the reasons why the reforms have not achieved the changes they intended. Twenty-two teachers attending a seven-day summer workshop were asked to submit one question about inquiry-based teaching at the end of each day. Questions were then analysed by researchers to determine: what internal or external pressures might be preventing teachers from changing their practices; and whether the teachers were struggling with the philosophy behind the reforms or the methods involved in their implementation. It was expected that pressure from external accountability standards, school administrators and parents would be the strongest deterrents to teachers in changing their practice. In fact, the two most frequently mentioned obstacles were the teachers' lack of confidence in their ability to assess inquiry-based learning and the resources needed to implement it. Teachers were wary of adopting new practices when they were unsure how they would measure student learning. The research also indicated that teachers had moved beyond questioning why the reforms had occurred, and were now questioning how to implement them in their classrooms. More than half the questions related to implementation, compared with 20 per cent relating to the reforms’ rationale. The research implies that education reformers should take the existing knowledge of teachers into account when proposing major changes to teaching practice. Significant reforms can turn experienced, highly competent teachers into novices struggling with new methodologies, and it is no surprise that teachers are often unwilling to undertake this transformation in the face of the many pressures upon them. Just as the reforms promote a constructivist view of learning for science students, science teachers must also be supported to construct their own learning by scaffolding new teaching methods on to existing practice.

Key Learning Areas

Science

Subject Headings

Inquiry based learning
Science teaching
Constructivism
Education policy
United States of America (USA)

Building teacher leadership in Hertfordshire

Volume 9 Number 1, March 2006; Pages 69–76
Joanne Mylles, David Frost

Sir John Lawes School in Hertfordshire, England, chose to sustain the momentum of their already highly successful school improvement program by focusing on unlocking the potential of teacher leadership. Sir John Lawes became one of a group of schools in the HertsCam network, working in partnership with University of Cambridge staff to support Teacher-Led Development Work (TLDW) groups. Teachers in the network undertake development work through a series of twilight seminars. Each participant creates an evidence portfolio documenting their work, leading to academic certification up to Masters level. An evaluation of the initiative formed part of the author’s own Master of Education research. Two case studies from the nine original members of the Sir John Lawes TLDW illustrate the potential of teacher leadership. Danielle is a young teacher whose development work focused on girls’ self-esteem. She developed a ‘self-esteem checklist’ based on relevant literature, which was administered by all Year 8 teachers to identify target students. These students were subsequently interviewed in order to develop the materials that would be used with them. Danielle was unsure about her leadership capacity at first, but her influence grew as her work gained momentum. Support from the school principal boosted her development. She reported that the experience changed her perception of leadership, which she had previously equated with formal management positions. She is now moving confidently into a leadership role in her department. Anne was already a departmental head, but wanted to extend her leadership capacity further. Her development work around metacognition in science involved students in trialling and evaluating different learning methods, and developing a new set of Year 9 resources based on their responses. Anne shared her work with a wider audience through the TLDW group, in lunchtime Learning Forums, and came to realise the opportunities that informal ‘chatting about teaching and learning’ offered to generate ideas and create new knowledge. There are currently TLDW groups in ten schools in the HertsCam network, giving rise to a valuable new community of practice.

KLA

Subject Headings

Professional development
School leadership
Great Britain
Teaching profession

What is 'specialist' about a specialist department in a Specialist School? A case study focusing on dilemmas and contradictions in the 'partnership' requirements

Volume 9 Number 1, March 2006; Pages 33–46
Anne Sinkinson

More than two thirds of England’s state secondary schools are now Specialist Schools. These schools receive targeted funding to develop one or more curriculum areas of particular strength, on the assumption that this will flow on to whole school improvement. Recent policy developments have widened the focus of specialism from individual school improvement to broader community benefit, and Specialist Schools must now allocate a proportion of their specialism funding to building partnerships with other local schools to disseminate their innovative practices. A case study of one mathematics Specialist School explored the partnership model in action. The school nominated four primary and two secondary schools as partners in its bid for specialisation, but tight application deadlines prevented detailed planning around the nature of the partnerships. Partnerships with the primary schools proved ‘ad hoc and short-lived’ due to staffing and timetabling restrictions. Approaches to the secondary schools required delicate assurances that the Specialist School was not claiming to be ‘God’s gift to teaching’, but that the partnership would be based on reciprocal sharing of expertise. One of the secondary schools resisted the partnership, suspicious that the Specialist School was seeking to ‘poach’ its senior students. This suspicion highlights the inherent tensions in introducing cooperative structures to a competitive, selection-based school system. The other school arranged for a teacher from the Specialist School to teach a small mathematics class for one afternoon per week. The teacher’s expertise enhanced the class’s learning, and the unfamiliar context provided him with valuable professional experience. However, no other teacher observed his classes, and no collaborative planning or reflection was undertaken, reducing the partnership to little more than a small amount of extra staffing for the partner school. The research generates a number of pointers for schools entering partnership arrangements: encourage deep debate within each school about what it has to offer and what it hopes to gain; collaborate with prospective partners to establish processes before funding is obtained; and ensure that the partnership is given equal priority to other activities in school timetabling, as it is unlikely to be successful if perceived as a ‘bolt-on’ by either party.

KLA

Subject Headings

State schools
Education policy
Educational innovations
Great Britain

Re-engaging disaffected pupils in learning: insights for policy and practice

Volume 9 Number 1, March 2006; Pages 17–31
Kathryn A. Riley, Steve Ellis, Jim Tarrant, Sherry Hallmond, Wendy Weinstock

In many OECD countries, current policy debates on disaffected students focus on deficiencies in the students, their families or communities. The Re-engaging Disaffected Pupils in Learning project offered five London secondary schools the chance to view their most difficult students in a new light. The two-year project began by identifying a team of staff in each school willing to make a change. The teams were given time to share their aspirations, creating a sense of common purpose to alleviate the isolation and powerlessness felt by many teachers when dealing with disaffected students. Teams then trialled a variety of research tools, including questionnaires, focus groups, student drawing analysis, and ‘being a pupil for a day’. The next step was bringing students themselves into the change process. Each school used a different method to obtain student views, supplemented by a questionnaire administered by researchers. Responses revealed that most students valued school but did not like it. The majority felt their teachers would help them if they asked a question, but few felt their teachers listened to them or understood them. Each school then created new learning opportunities for their students. In one school, students planned their ‘perfect school day’, incorporating their favourite activities in each class. Students also undertook challenges at a local outdoor education centre to enhance self-esteem, built student-teacher relationships, and promote teamwork and a sense of belonging. The project has demonstrated to researchers the importance of reconceptualising disaffected students as potential change agents, not as problems to be solved. New approaches to learning, such as kinaesthetic activities, should be explored to reach students disengaged by conventional education. Giving staff the opportunity to participate in a professional learning community can generate new approaches. Lastly, the project showed the profound mutual benefits of making time to let students and teachers get to know each other, and view each other in a more positive light. Reaching disaffected students is always complicated, and teachers face significant challenges in sustaining momentum and change, but the rewards to be gained from such efforts are considerable.

KLA

Subject Headings

Secondary education
Great Britain
Professional development
Teaching and learning
Students
Motivation

Am I a teacher or a nurse-maid?

Spring 2006; Pages 6–7
Brian Hill

Teachers are increasingly expected to provide pastoral care to their students. They are also faced with growing numbers of emotionally disturbed students, unsettled by dysfunctional home lives, competing values systems within society and the seductive influence of the media. ‘Wellbeing’ is a supposedly values-neutral term that human services professionals have borrowed from health science to address these issues. However, any application of this term to human subjects is values-laden, as it involves making judgements about what is good for human beings. Wellbeing may come into conflict with moral values. For example, it may be taken to mean contentment with the status quo, where discontent might be a morally preferable response. Wellbeing intersects with values in that it results not only from physical and emotional health, but also from a sense of individual purpose and meaning, sometimes conceptualised as ‘spirituality’. As both institutional religion and empirical science have declined in popularity, postmodernist and ‘new age’ philosophies have redefined spirituality as the pursuit of a private vision. The essential spiritual element of human existence must be recognised when addressing wellbeing in education. Schools should assist students to recognise and pursue their personal framework of meaning, and make constructive, not self-destructive, life choices. This must involve learning about the cultural resources available to support their search for meaning, including the study of world views and morality, as well as the assumptions and values underlying all curriculum areas. It creates an imperative for school systems to support the wellbeing of teachers, so that they can model life skills for their students. Increasing expectations on teachers to assume responsibility for helping disturbed children, as well as to undertake detailed administrative tasks, will not enable them to perform the functions of ‘enlightenment and skilling’ that schools do best.

KLA

Subject Headings

Values education
Counselling
Emotions
Teacher-student relationships
Social education
Students

Good manners in the classroom

Spring 2006; Pages 48–49
Julie Rosengren

Prominent Australian politicians have recently complained of a lack of manners in Australian society. Children need to learn good manners so that they understand their social boundaries and can participate cooperatively in society. Good manners are about more than saying ‘please’ and ‘thank you’. They are grounded in the broader value of respect for others. Although teaching respect is the responsibility of the whole community, not just schools, there are many things schools can do to contribute. Introducing good manners into the classroom might begin with a brainstorming session about what good manners are. Children can then be given homework assignments to practise good manners and report on their experiences. Further development may include a class ‘Guild of Good Manners’ agreement to help direct student behaviour. Communicating expectations and gaining commitment are highly effective ways to create harmony in a group or classroom. In another best practice example, the leader of a sports camp began the event by clearly stating that the only way students could get something from a teacher was to ask politely. Participants were expected to talk calmly, listen well, say ‘please’ and ‘thank you’, and smile, all behaviours that exhibit respect. The most powerful way to teach respect is to lead by example. Bending to speak to a child at their level, listening, clapping rhythms to get class attention, or acknowledging children who display good manners, are simple but effective ways to demonstrate respect in the classroom. The author also recommends Pumpkin Soup by Helen Cooper as a resource about manners for primary students.

KLA

Subject Headings

Behaviour management
Primary education
Social adjustment

Differential teacher attention to boys and girls in the classroom

Volume 58 Number 3, August 2006; Pages 339–366
Robyn  Beaman, Kevin Wheldall, Coral Kemp

An extensive review of literature on girls’ and boys’ education supports the belief that teachers pay more attention to boys than to girls in the classroom. However the key cause of this difference is not gender bias in male or female teachers, but rather the fact that boys are more likely than girls to misbehave. To forestall disruption teachers give more eye contact and other forms of attention to boys, on both academic and behavioural issues. This attention includes instruction and academic questioning, as well as criticism. Boys’ higher level of misbehaviour may be due to ‘a poor fit between the culturally prescribed male gender role and the student role’. However the greater overall attention to boys is misleading, since it is not uniform but is concentrated on a few, disruptive boys. The relatively greater compliance typical of girls works to their advantage in school, but to their disadvantage in the workforce. A recent action research project was found to reduce boys’ misbehaviour significantly, with benefits to all students in the class. The teachers in the project gave their students high levels of positive feedback about their classroom behaviour and task engagement. Rather than reacting to misbehaviour the teachers headed it off by taking the initiative in their interactions with students. The article gives close attention to a range of specific findings and debates in the literature. For example, off-task comments in class are most common among boys in the early years and among under achievers of either sex in later years. High-achieving boys have been found to dominate class by calling out answers without being asked to, while low-achieving boys use off-task forms of disruption. Attention seeking behaviour can also assume more subtle forms such as ‘consistently taking unusual positions on issues in classroom discussion’.

KLA

Subject Headings

Teaching and learning
Teacher-student relationships
Classroom management
Educational evaluation
Boys' education
Girls' education

School skills ward off more ills

Spring 2006; Pages 15–16
Brenton Prosser

The rise of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in today’s young people may be caused in part by changes in society. Blue-collar work has dwindled, leaving fewer spaces in society for people who have a lot of physical energy and who prefer activity to reflection. Growing concerns about child safety mean spaces for children to ‘let off steam’ outside school are dwindling as well. Although Australian society has traditionally valued qualities of energy and rebelliousness alongside courage and creativity, schools are under pressure to curb these attributes in children. The model of the ‘hard-working, studious female student’ has become the benchmark for student behaviour, catering to workforce demands for smart and creative, but also focused and compliant, employees. Many myths surround ADHD, more often formulated to shift blame than to inform solutions. Schools need to dispel these myths to promote a more constructive understanding of ADHD. ADHD is not caused by television, diet or poor parenting. Contrary to popular belief, most parents who seek ADHD medication for their child do so reluctantly, and only after avenues for educational support have been exhausted. The perception that ADHD is solely a medical issue must be replaced with a broader debate that also includes educational expertise. Lastly, teachers need to be provided with time and support to learn more about ADHD and address the needs of individual students within their class. Larger class sizes favour ‘chalk and talk’ teaching, which neither suits students with ADHD nor provides teachers with the time to understand them. Although medication may open a ‘window of opportunity’ to reach students with ADHD, the skills they need can only be provided through educational, not medical, support.

KLA

Subject Headings

Learning problems
Attention
Disabled

A study of the impact of reform on students' written calculation methods after five years' implementation of the National Numeracy Strategy in England

Volume 32 Number 3, July 2006; Pages 363–380
Julia Anghileri

The National Numeracy Strategy (NNS) in England was introduced in 1998 as a means to equip students to think more flexibly and creatively about numerical calculations. Although not enforced, the NNS influenced almost all schools in England. It was accompanied by the National Numeracy Framework, which outlined programs of study and expected achievement for each year level. A study in 2003 evaluated the impact of the NNS on students’ learning of division, the traditional ‘capstone’ of the primary arithmetic curriculum. It replicated a study undertaken in 1998, and involved Year 5 students at ten strongly performing secondary schools within one region of England. The study found that gains in students’ understanding of division between 1998 and 2003 were modest and uneven. In less successful schools students were more likely to employ inefficient strategies. In 1998 boys and girls performed equivalently, but in 2003 boys were more successful at division. Boys used informal methods and mental calculations more often and more successfully than girls. However girls were more successful than boys at ‘chunking’, a promising new approach that involves repeated subtraction of intuitively selected multiples, or chunks, of the divisor. Not all groups of teachers encouraged the use of this method, which may help to account for variations in performance between schools and in particular variation between girls’ and boys’ results at different schools. The Framework tagged the chunking method as an ‘informal’ strategy and this description may have dissuaded some groups of teachers from using it. The use of chunking also requires a greater leap from traditional approaches for teachers, and may therefore require more professional development before being taken up more generally.

Key Learning Areas

Mathematics

Subject Headings

Educational evaluation
Boys' education
Great Britain
Girls' education
Primary education
Mathematics teaching
Curriculum planning

'Interactive' teaching in numeracy lessons: what do children have to say?

Volume 36 Number 2, June 2006; Pages 221–235
Nick Pratt

The National Numeracy Strategy (NNS) was adopted in England in the late 1990s as a means to encourage higher order thinking in mathematics, by reducing individualised written and factual work in favour of more advanced mental calculations and whole-class discussion around higher level ideas. However the adoption of such discussion faces barriers raised by the ‘complex interrelationship between classroom cultures, the nature of the curriculum and the nature of mathematics itself’. The NNS has changed lesson structure by introducing a formalised division of the lesson time into class-wide discussion and individual or group work. The NNS was also designed to introduce a greater emphasis on classroom interaction between the teacher and students, as a way to encourage children to articulate mathematical concepts. However the NNS prescribed lesson objectives narrowly, dividing related ideas into separate lessons that required teachers to direct classroom discussion along fixed channels. Perhaps as a result, evaluations of the NNS did not find evidence of deep changes in student-teacher interactions. Whole-class discussion continued to be used by teachers in traditional ways, for the transmission of information and the asking of factual questions required by the prescriptive lesson structures. In the past two years the NNS has been superseded by the Primary National Strategy in England. Like the NNS, it focuses on student discussion as a means of learning, but again the ‘deconstruction of this function into objectives’ runs the risk of focusing teachers on the development of skills and vocabulary as ends in themselves rather than as means to promote learning.

Key Learning Areas

Mathematics

Subject Headings

Educational planning
Education policy
Curriculum planning
Great Britain
Primary education
Numeracy
Mathematics teaching

Analysing research on teachers' electronic portfolios: what does it tell us about portfolios and methods for studying them?

Volume 22 Number 2, Spring 2006; Pages 89–97
Joanne Carney

A literature survey in the USA has analysed seven research studies investigating the value of electronic portfolios (EPs) in developing and assessing teachers’ knowledge. There has been little empirical research into the effectiveness of EPs. This study examined the technical quality of EPs, their fairness, practical feasibility and technological issues associated with them. It was found that EPs could be used to assess teachers’ knowledge and skills and could prompt deep learning, particularly when constructed within a learning community. The few available studies of portfolio implementation effects in P–12 schools describe them as having positive results. The fairness of EPs has been questioned, since it is difficult to establish the level of assistance the creator has received from peers or instructors. A number of psychometric, legal and practical issues were found to impact on the feasibility of using EPs for teacher assessment and learning. EPs may be of greater use in formative rather than summative assessment. Research on EPs should include more large-scale and long-term studies.

KLA

Subject Headings

Portfolios in education
Information and Communications Technology (ICT)
Educational evaluation

Picturing evaporation: learning science literacy through a particle representation

Volume 52 Number 1, 2nd  Quarter  2006; Pages 12–17
Russell Tytler, Suzanne Peterson, Vaughan Prain

Primary students need to experience a range of different representations of scientific concepts to be able to translate, connect and ultimately understand these concepts. Scientific literacy entails the interpretation of data presented in linguistic, numerical, graphical and tabular formats. A sequence of classroom activities for Grade 5 students has explored evaporation using visual, verbal and gestural modes of representation, and the use of a particle model for understanding the evaporation process. Students were found to respond differently to different modes of representation and to work with them in different ways. Students were challenged to produce a coherent, coordinated explanation of what they had said, experienced and drawn, which they did with varying degrees of success. Constructing and refining representations is a core knowledge-construction activity within science and part of learning science effectively. The construction and use of representations is of major importance in the science classroom.

Key Learning Areas

Science

Subject Headings

Primary education
Science teaching
Science literacy

The community contribution to science learning: making it count

Research Conference 2006 Boosting science learning - what will it take?
Leonie J. Rennie

Scientifically literate people are interested in the world around them. They can talk about science, assess the quality of evidence, and are sceptical of scientific claims made by others. They are able to make their own informed decisions on science-related matters. Research indicates most students neither engage with nor learn science meaningfully and are not scientifically literate when they leave school. The challenge to science teachers is to engage the disinterested majority. One way this can be done is by bringing school science and the out-of-school science community closer together. Useful science-based community institutions and services include the students' family and friends, institutions such as aquaria, zoos and environmental centres, science-related community and government organisations and the media, particularly television and the Internet. The learning of science can be seen as a personal, contextualised process that takes time. Students have different personal backgrounds, motivations and learning styles. Learning has been shown to be contextualised according to where, when, with whom and how it happens. Extending the science class into the community demonstrates the application of science in the everyday world and aids the transfer of learning to new situations. Meaningful learning takes time because it is cumulative. If some of this learning occurs in out-of-school environments, then there is a greater likelihood of such learning continuing after the student has left school. The addition of community resources to the science curriculum will increase the likelihood of successful student engagement with science. Teachers contemplating such programs should keep in mind several points. There are many uncontrolled variables in ‘real-world’ science and traditional science concepts provide at best abstract explanations and imperfect predictions. Much of the science knowledge associated with everyday concerns is characterised by uncertainty and dispute, and there are often competing or even conflicting social and cultural interpretations of how to use scientific knowledge. Successful projects have been based on some issue or stimulus that comes from the community, require local knowledge, model science as a way of thinking and acting, are integrated into science at school, involve negotiation and decision-making with the community and have tangible outcomes. Successful projects also required some funding. Guided community contributions to science can be made to count.

Key Learning Areas

Science

Subject Headings

School and community
Science teaching
Science literacy